The US has warned shipping companies they could face sanctions if they pay Iran for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

An alert on Friday by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) warned US persons and companies were generally banned from paying Iranian government entities, and non-US persons may risk exposure to sanctions if they pay.

“Maritime industry participants involved with vessels calling at Iranian ports face significant sanctions risk under multiple sanctions authorities targeting Iran’s shipping sector and ports”, OFAC commented.

Iran has severely limited traffic through the strait since the war began in February. The US has also enforced a naval blockade on Iranian ports.

Iran has called the US interception of ships entering and leaving Iranian ports under the blockade “piracy”.

Tehran says it has collected tolls from ships To navigate freely through the strait, with Hamidreza Haji Bababei, deputy speaker of Iran’s Parliament, last week claiming the first toll revenue had been deposited with the country’s Central Bank.

No further detail was provided on the amount of the toll, the method of collection nor who paid it. The BBC could not independently verify this claim.

OFAC’s alert noted payments could involve cash as well as “digital assets, offsets, informal swaps, or other in-kind payments,” including charitable donations and payments at Iranian embassies.

The agency warned that non-US persons who pay could also face civil and criminal enforcement liability if payments cause US persons, such as insurers and financial institutions, to violate sanctions.

OFAC remarked it “will continue to aggressively target Iran’s main revenue-generating sectors, in particular its petroleum and petrochemical sectors”.

The US Treasury also declared sanctions on three Iranian foreign currency exchange houses on Friday, saying they have converted oil revenue into more usable currencies.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted his agency would “relentlessly target the regime’s ability to generate, move and repatriate funds, and pursue anyone enabling Tehran’s attempts to evade sanctions”.

After the US and Israel attacked Iran on 28 February, Iran has been targeting and striking ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, including seizing two of them. This also touches on aspects of geopolitics.

The US has also enforced a naval blockade since 13 April, stopping all ships from travelling to or from Iranian ports. Trump had hoped the blockade would put pressure on Iran by targeting its revenue from the tolls and oil sales.

US Central Command (Centcom) remarked on Friday that 45 commercial ships have been told to turn around since the blockade began.

About 3,000 ships typically pass through the strait each month, but that number has dropped sharply to just a handful each day.

The strait is a crucial shipping channel for oil and other goods including food, medicines and technological supplies.

UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, mentioned on Friday that the closure of key maritime routes has forced the adopt of longer and more expensive alternatives to transport aid.

Higher transport and fuel costs “disproportionately affect the public in emergencies”, including refugees and displaced individuals, the agency noted.

The cost of delivering aid to Sudan, entering its fourth year of war, has doubled in recent months, as rerouting shipments around the Cape of Favorable Hope in South Africa adds up to 25 days in delivery time.

The UN agency stated it has adapted quickly by rerouting sea cargo and relying more on land corridors. But it warned that “if instability in the Middle East persists, rising costs, delays and limited transport capacity are likely to constrain humanitarian operations further.”

The US and Iran began a fragile ceasefire on 8 April. Since then, the two countries have held talks, but no long-term deal has been reached.

Iran gave mediators in Pakistan a proposal to end the war on Thursday night, according to Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency. US President Donald Trump has responded negatively to the proposal.

“They want to construct a deal, I’m not excited, so we’ll see what happens,” Trump remarked on Friday.

He added, on the other hand: “Because they have no military left, essentially. I’m not sure if they ever get there.”

The president did not give details about the proposal or explain why he was not satisfied, but said: “They’re asking for things that I can’t agree to.”

He also voiced frustration with Iran’s leadership, saying: “It’s a very disjointed leadership. They all want to construct a deal, but they’re all messed up.”

After Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in US and Israeli strikes on the first day of the war, his son Mojtaba Khamenei succeeded him. decision, on the other hand-making seems less centralised than it was before the war.

On Thursday, Trump mentioned he was briefed on options for Iran ranging from “blast the hell out of them and finish them forever” to “make a deal”.

The conflict began after the US and Israel carried out wide-ranging strikes on Iran in February. Iran responded by launching attacks on Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf.

The US and Israel commented Iran was trying to develop a nuclear bomb, which Tehran has strongly denied.

Trump repeats that he is ‘not happy’ with Iran as deadline to seek approval for war looms

Why and how is US blockading Iranian ports in Strait of Hormuz?

Former US officials criticise Pentagon silence on deadly Iran school attack

Oil price rises above $120 after reports of ‘extended’ Iran blockade