The open-access preprint repository arXiv is intensifying its efforts to combat the misuse of artificial intelligence in scientific submissions. Recognizing its crucial role in disseminating early-stage research, particularly in fields like computer science and mathematics, arXiv is introducing significant policy changes to ensure the integrity of the research it hosts.

Previously, arXiv had implemented measures such as requiring endorsements from established authors for first-time submitters to address the influx of low-quality, AI-generated content. The organization’s transition to an independent nonprofit status is also expected to bolster its resources for tackling such issues.

The latest directive, announced by Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv’s computer science section, emphasizes author accountability. He stated that “incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation” will lead to a loss of trust in the entire paper. Such evidence could include fabricated references or direct interactions with the AI model found within the submission.

Authors found in violation of this policy, by submitting papers with unchecked AI-generated content like “hallucinated references,” erroneous information, or plagiarized material, will face a one-year ban from arXiv. Following this suspension, any future submissions will be contingent upon prior acceptance by a reputable peer-reviewed journal. This policy underscores that researchers remain fully responsible for all content, regardless of its origin, including any inaccuracies or inappropriate material generated by AI tools.