Albert Manifold, the recently ousted chairman of BP, has issued a strong rebuttal against allegations regarding his professional conduct. Following his abrupt removal from the position, Manifold stated that the decision was made without prior warning or explanation, and he categorically disputes the characterization of his behavior by the company’s board.

The BP board previously announced Manifold’s departure, citing serious concerns related to governance standards, oversight, and conduct. While senior directors expressed disappointment over what they deemed unacceptable issues, Manifold maintains that his tenure was focused on driving meaningful change, including cost reduction and higher organizational standards. He has vowed to challenge what he describes as a false narrative surrounding his exit.

This leadership shakeup occurs at a critical juncture for the energy giant, which is currently undergoing a significant strategic shift under CEO Meg O’Neill. As BP pivots its focus back toward oil and gas assets, the sudden vacancy in the chairmanship has introduced fresh uncertainty. The news has already impacted the market, with BP shares experiencing a decline in recent trading sessions.

In the wake of the announcement, various stakeholders, including climate advocacy groups, are calling for greater transparency. Groups such as ACCR and Follow This have urged the board to provide a clear account of the circumstances leading to the dismissal, emphasizing the need for experienced leadership to navigate the company’s complex energy transition and governance requirements.