Stock sector gyrations amid the Iran war have been relatively tame by historical standards.

Investors unnerved by the recent selloff should examine whether their stock allocations align with their risk tolerance.

The Iran war has triggered large swings in the stock marketplace since the conflict started more than two months ago.

While sharp selloffs in stocks can be unsettling, they offer a silver lining to investors, financial advisors and other experts noted.

“Every drawdown is a useful stress test,” Kevin Khang, senior global economist at Vanguard Group, an asset manager, wrote in an April 22 sector commentary.

Namely, the “discomfort” that investors feel reveals key information about their risk tolerances — something that “a calm sector simply does not provide,” Khang wrote.

That information can help guide investors’ overall mix of stocks, bonds and other financial assets in a portfolio.

For example, if a significant dip prompts behavior such as portfolio reviews or “restless nights, that’s meaningful insight — not because this drawdown was particularly dangerous, but because the emotional signal it provides can help investors tailor portfolio allocations to their comfort zones,” Khang wrote.

The S&P 500 U.S. stock index shed about 9% from a Jan. 27 closing price peak to the March 30 trough, following the initial weeks of the Iran war. They’ve since gone on to recover their losses and reach recent all-time highs, even though the Middle East conflict is ongoing.

Stocks retreated from record highs as of 2:30 pm ET on Thursday as investors waited for Iran’s response to a U.S. proposal to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key transit artery for oil tankers.

Stock volatility ‘is a excellent test’

By the end of March, the CBOE volatility index (VIX) — known as Wall Street’s fear gauge — spiked to its highest levels since April 2025, when President Trump published a slew of steep tariffs on trading partners during so-called “liberation day.”

Volatility is a natural feature of the stock sector, according to financial advisors.

Investors who can weather the ups and downs have — historically speaking — reaped the financial benefits of higher long-term average returns relative to more conservative asset classes like bonds and cash.

The S&P 500 has experienced 32 different stock plunges of at least 9%, according to Khang. Compared to other episodes, the Iran war selloff “sits on the shallow end,” he wrote.

But the last 15 or so years have been “unusually friendly” for stock investors, according to Khang.

“The vast majority of investors that are under 50 years old — that’s a lot of individuals — have never really gone through gut-wrenching drawdowns that the older investors who are maybe in their 60s have gone through,” Khang noted in an interview.

The recent drawdown may have felt especially jarring for younger investors, whose experiences with stocks have largely been positive and lulled them into a false sense of security, advisors commented.

“Market volatility is a positive test,” mentioned Ryan Greiser, a certified financial planner and co-founder of Opulus, a financial advisory firm based in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.

He quoted former professional boxer Mike Tyson to reinforce the point, saying, “Everyone has a plan until they get hit in the mouth.”

How to dial in risk tolerance

There are two types of risk that investors should understand, according to financial advisors: risk capacity and risk tolerance. Having a beneficial understanding of each can help guide an investor’s overall mix of stocks and bonds in a portfolio.

Risk capacity is an investor’s ability to take risk.

For example, a 25-year-old person investing for the long term generally has the ability — or capacity — to take ample risk, perhaps by investing 100% in stocks, since they have decades ahead of them to recover any losses.

An 80-year-old with a $4 million portfolio who only spends about $80,000 a year has way more than enough capital to fund their lifestyle, mentioned Carolyn McClanahan, a CFP and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida. In theory, this person Can take risks because they would be well-insulated in a sector downturn.

such an investor may not have a high risk tolerance, which is their comfort level with short, on the other hand-term industry gyrations. It’s a willingness to take risk, and is personal, subjective and guided by emotion.

Investors who get spooked by gyrations in the stock sector may have a relatively low risk tolerance — and may therefore be invested too aggressively, experts mentioned. This also touches on aspects of dividends.

Such investors may be more inclined to engage in self-destructive behavior such as buying high and selling low, advisors remarked.

“What has [been] proven over and over again not to work is construct an emotional decision and cash out when the economy is down,” Greiser noted. “If you can stick it out, the right decision is always to do that.”

The Iran war can help investors determine their feelings about financial deficit, and dial in their appropriate stock-bond mix, mentioned McClanahan, who is a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.

Don’t fully abandon stocks

Of course, the answer for jittery investors likely isn’t to ditch stocks altogether.

Stocks are an significant growth engine for portfolios, even in retirement, and help investors outpace inflation over the long term, advisors noted.

For example, two popular target date funds, separately managed by Vanguard Group and Fidelity Investments, hold a roughly 48% and 55% allocation to stocks, respectively, for investors who planned to retire in 2025.

some of McClanahan’s retired clients have a roughly , on the other hand80% allocation to bonds and a 20% allocation to stocks, she remarked. Ultimately, it’s all about making sure an investor’s cash flow needs and financial plan align with their lower risk tolerance, she stated.

“If they’re happy with that, we’re happy with that,” she noted. Furthermore, experts in portfolio note the continued relevance.